Hi João,
I think you should definitely put up a PR for this. I'm restarting the
discussion about allowed operator/identifier characters (
https://gist.github.com/jtbandes/c0b0c072181dcd22c3147802025d0b59), and I
think your proposal is an obvious requirement for any solution to be
complete. :-)

Jacob

On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 7:20 AM, João Pinheiro <swift-evolution@swift.org>
wrote:

> The crunch from Swift 3 has now passed and I'm bringing up this proposal
> again. Should I go ahead and issue a pull request for this?
>
> Sincerely,
> João Pinheiro
>
>
> On 26 Jul 2016, at 22:32, Chris Lattner <clatt...@apple.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Jul 26, 2016, at 12:22 PM, João Pinheiro via swift-evolution <
> swift-evolution@swift.org> wrote:
>
> This proposal [gist
> <https://gist.github.com/JoaoPinheiro/5f226f46c67d235a7039c775a4300800>]
> is the result of the discussions from the thread "Prohibit invisible
> characters in identifier names
> <http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.swift.evolution/21022>". I hope
> it's still on time for inclusion in Swift 3.
>
>
> Hi João,
>
> Unfortunately, we’re out of time to accept new proposals.  Tomorrow is the
> last day for *implementation* work on source breaking changes to be done.
> We can talk about this next week for Swift 3.x or Swift 4.
>
> -Chris
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> swift-evolution mailing list
> swift-evolution@swift.org
> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
>
>
_______________________________________________
swift-evolution mailing list
swift-evolution@swift.org
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution

Reply via email to