> On 14 Oct 2016, at 20:59, Chris Lattner via swift-evolution
> <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> * What is your evaluation of the proposal?
don't see what it really adds compared to a more explicit name. As a general
rule I prefer everything to be explicitly named except where a case is
genuinely trivial (like the dollar syntax for closure arguments).
> * Is the problem being addressed significant enough to warrant a change
> to Swift?
If it had more benefits maybe, but I just don't see them.
> * Does this proposal fit well with the feel and direction of Swift?
No, I think that allowing the dollar sign could be confusing alongside dollar
sign variables in closures, and I feel that Swift is better being explicit
> * If you have used other languages or libraries with a similar feature,
> how do you feel that this proposal compares to those?
values, but I've never felt that I was really gaining anything significant by
using it as a variable name.
> * How much effort did you put into your review? A glance, a quick
> reading, or an in-depth study?
swift-evolution mailing list