> Le 17 oct. 2016 à 23:20, Max Moiseev via swift-evolution
> <firstname.lastname@example.org> a écrit :
> Hi Louis,
> I believe, sometimes there are situations where you know for sure that your
> collection is not empty. Maybe you are already in the context where the check
> has been performed. In these cases there is no reason you’d have to pay the
> price of an emptiness check once again.
You have to pay the price anyway, as the check has to be performed to decide if
the software should abort.
swift-evolution mailing list