On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 9:29 AM, Jonathan S. Shapiro via swift-evolution < [email protected]> wrote:
> Quick poll as a sanity check on a possible alternative for operators: > > If we admitted [:Sm:] and [:So:] and the traditional ASCII operator > characters, would that cover the things that people currently feel > passionate about? That would almost certainly be compliant with UAX31 once > it settles, and I *think* it covers all of the cases people have raised > here. > > Useful links if you want to check: > > [:Sm:] Symbol, Math > <http://www.fileformat.info/info/unicode/category/Sm/list.htm> > > [:So:] Symbol, Other > <http://www.fileformat.info/info/unicode/category/So/list.htm> > > This would define both ∞ and ∅ as operators.
_______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
