> On 22 Oct 2016, at 04:02, Braeden Profile <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> But what would that mean?  If I reference `ProtocolName.InnerType`, that 
> doesn’t always have meaning.  In fact, if you have two different extensions 
> where AssociatedType equals something else, there’s a type ambiguity from 
> other code.  I suspect it would only work if that InnerType was mandated to 
> be `private`.

You would need a reference to a (ProtocolName where AssociatedType == Int), 
which you can get either from a `self` inside the extension or from a generic 
parameter:

struct MyValue<T> : ProtocolName { typealias AssociatedType = T }

let _ = MyValue<Int>().InnerType()

> 
>> On Oct 17, 2016, at 12:44 PM, Adrian Zubarev via swift-evolution 
>> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> 
>> That option should not be disallowed. Here is a simple example you might 
>> want to build at some point:
>> 
>> protocol ProtocolName {
>>      
>>     associatedtype AssociatedType
>> }
>> 
>> extension ProtocolName where AssociatedType == Int {
>>   
>>     struct InnerType {}
>> }
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Adrian Zubarev
>> Sent with Airmail
>> 
>> Am 17. Oktober 2016 um 20:30:58, Karl via swift-evolution 
>> ([email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>) schrieb:
>> 
>>> Is your vision that each conforming type would have to provide its own 
>>> nested type as specified by the protocol?
>>> 
>>> Or could the protocol itself define a nested type and anything could use it?
>>> 
>>> protocol FloatingPoint: … {
>>>     enum RoundingRule {
>>>         // Do I put an implementation here?
>>>     }
>>> }
>>> 
>>> No, types which are defined inside the protocol are implemented there. 
>>> Providing your own types to satisfy a conformance is what associated types 
>>> are for.
>>> 
>>> If you wanted something like that, you could do it with a nested protocol + 
>>> associated type:
>>> 
>>> protocol FloatingPoint {
>>> 
>>>     protocol _RoundingRule { func round(_ : Super) -> Super }
>>>     associatedType RoundingRule : _RoundingRule
>>> }
>>> 
>>> struct Float : FloatingPoint {
>>> 
>>>     enum RoundingRule : _RoundingRule {
>>>         func round(_ val: Float) -> Float {
>>>             /* switch self, perform rounding… */ 
>>>         }
>>>     }
>>> }
>>> 
>>> That brings up an interesting point, though - we would need a way to refer 
>>> to the outer protocol (I used “Super” here).
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> swift-evolution mailing list
>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution 
>> <https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution>
> 

_______________________________________________
swift-evolution mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution

Reply via email to