> On 17 Oct 2016, at 20:31, Adrian Zubarev via swift-evolution
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> That’s also on the line:
> [https://github.com/apple/swift/blob/611fc78d28a5da97dd1bea40761b913b1077aef5/docs/GenericsManifesto.md#nested-generics
>
> <https://github.com/apple/swift/blob/611fc78d28a5da97dd1bea40761b913b1077aef5/docs/GenericsManifesto.md#nested-generics>](https://github.com/apple/swift/blob/611fc78d28a5da97dd1bea40761b913b1077aef5/docs/GenericsManifesto.md#nested-generics
>
> <https://github.com/apple/swift/blob/611fc78d28a5da97dd1bea40761b913b1077aef5/docs/GenericsManifesto.md#nested-generics>)
>
> --
> Adrian Zubarev
> Sent with Airmail
>
> Am 17. Oktober 2016 um 20:26:47, T.J. Usiyan ([email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>) schrieb:
>
>> I want this feature. Both class in protocol and protocol in class could
>> clean up many relationships but I think that a blocking concern is "How does
>> this interact with generics?" Nesting types in generic types is already
>> disallowed and how different is this feature from that?
> _______________________________________________
> swift-evolution mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
And even partially implemented, behind the flag
“-enable-experimental-nested-generic-types”. I don’t know what’s missing from
it, but it seemed to work in some simple cases last time I tried.
- Karl
_______________________________________________
swift-evolution mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
