> On Oct 24, 2016, at 22:33, Chris Lattner via swift-evolution
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> would it be possible to carve off some obvious blocks of emoji support as
> identifiers (e.g. not symbols, flags, or anything else complicated), and
> carve off the most obvious blocks of the math operators as operators? For
> the operator set, maybe we could start with some small subset of 100 (totally
> random number here) operators that are commonly requested and seem obvious,
> then expand it out to a principled set once UAX31 is resolved?
+1 to this approach.
Regarding emoji, I don’t really use them much myself, so I’m favor of the
minimal amount of work needed to get them under control (for now). I’d rather
see the effort spent elsewhere. The operator stuff is interesting though.
-Matt
_______________________________________________
swift-evolution mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
