+1 Strongly in favour of this one. One of those things that seems obvious in retrospect
It would also make the language more enjoyable to code in. When Xcode nags me about my function not providing a return value when I've only just started writing it, I get the irrational urge to tell Xcode to shut its (metaphorical) mouth. Using context to tell me errors "just in time" would be much more Apple-like. Sent from my iPhone > On Jan 25, 2017, at 3:59 PM, Karl Wagner via swift-evolution > <swift-evolution@swift.org> wrote: > > >> On 26 Jan 2017, at 00:46, Jonathan Hull via swift-evolution >> <swift-evolution@swift.org> wrote: >> >> One of the biggest issues that I saw while teaching Swift to newbies (most >> had not programmed before) is confusion based on the early warnings/errors >> that swift/xcode gives you as they type. What would happen is that they >> would type a variable, and it would say… “You haven’t used this variable” >> and so they would just click the fixit because they trust the compiler more >> than they trust themselves. This would lead to a point where they were very >> confused because some of the code was code they had thought through, and >> some of it was changed by random fixits in ways they didn’t understand… and >> so it would lead to more errors/fixits until they had errors which couldn’t >> be fixed. >> >> By the end of the semester they had learned to ignore the warnings until >> they were finished, but it took a couple of months to get there, and was a >> big deterrent to new users… (Also, learning to ignore warnings ignorer to >> use a system seems like an anti-pattern) >> >> I have a good friend who is an expert perl programmer who tried Swift and >> eventually gave up because he couldn’t figure out which errors to ignore >> (and which might just disappear a minute later) and which he needed to pay >> attention to. He was overwhelmed by the sheer number, and they didn’t seem >> trustworthy to him (“Swift is full of lies!” he would say of the warnings… >> which is a mantra I find myself parroting when I get those >> appearing/disappearing errors). >> >> >> To fix this, I propose adding a way to annotate warnings/errors to say how >> immediate they need to be: >> • Immediate - This error should always be shown >> • DifferentLine - This error should only be shown once the cursor is on a >> different line >> • DifferentScope - This error should only be shown once the cursor is in a >> different scope from this line >> • DifferentFunction - This error should only be shown once the cursor is in >> a different function >> >> So the “You haven’t used this variable” warning would be marked >> .differentScope, meaning that it would only show up once you had clicked >> away from the scope. The reason for this is that while you are in the same >> scope, it is fairly likely that you are still going to use the variable… so >> the warning is premature. Once I have left the scope, it makes sense to warn >> me. >> >> Similarly, the “You need a return value” error would be marked >> .differentFunction because you are likely to add one while typing the >> function. But a type mismatch with the return value would either be >> .immediate or .differentLine because you have made an error that isn’t >> likely to be fixed with more typing on other lines. >> >> I think this will cut way down on the number of warnings/errors that need to >> be ignored, which should increase trust in the system overall. >> >> To be clear, I am only proposing adding the annotation to Swift (probably >> with a default of .differentLine). The compiler would not repress the >> warning/error itself… just vend it with a way to retrieve the annotation. >> IDE makers like Apple/Xcode would then be free to use that extra information >> in their UI if desired. >> >> Thanks, >> Jon >> _______________________________________________ >> swift-evolution mailing list >> swift-evolution@swift.org >> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution > > Having warnings and errors vanish and then reappear as you click in/out of > function seems far more confusing to me. Is there any other language/IDE that > does things that way? > > - Karl > _______________________________________________ > swift-evolution mailing list > swift-evolution@swift.org > https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution _______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list swift-evolution@swift.org https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
