> Le 6 mars 2017 à 19:27, Nevin Brackett-Rozinsky via swift-evolution > <swift-evolution@swift.org> a écrit : > > I support this proposal to restore the file-based meaning of “private”. >
> Personally, I do not think we need any more fine-grained access level than > this, so I lean toward solution 1 (remove the scoped access level). However, > I would also be okay with solution 2 (rename the scoped access level to > scoped) if other people have a strong need for it. > I support it too, but not because I don’t think finer grain access is not needed, but because it I think was done the wrong way. I think we should revert to the simple original access modifiers until we got a clear proposal that include submodules, as they are going to be a critical part in defining access level control. Having fewer access level modifiers until then will reduce the compatibility issues we will have once we want to switch to a better design. _______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list swift-evolution@swift.org https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
