0 Its not something I would use, but I don’t see why not.
Regards, Rien Site: http://balancingrock.nl Blog: http://swiftrien.blogspot.com Github: http://github.com/Balancingrock Project: http://swiftfire.nl > On 10 Mar 2017, at 22:40, Kilian Koeltzsch via swift-evolution > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi all, > > I sent the message below to swift-users@ ~a day ago, but this might be a > better place to ask and gather some discussion. It is a rather minor > suggestion and I'm just looking for some opinions. > > Declaring a function that has default parameters currently looks like this: > > func foo(bar: String = "baz") { > print(bar) > } > > Now I'm wondering if there would be any problems if it were possible to omit > the type annotation for default params and let Swift's type inference handle > that. > > func foo(bar = "baz") { > print(bar) > } > > It feels to be equivalent to omitting type annotations with variable > declarations. Obviously more complex types would still require annotations > being specified. Off the top of my head I can't think of any negative > ramifications this might bring, be it in simple function/method declarations > or protocol extensions and elsewhere. > Any further input or examples for situations where this might cause issues > would be much appreciated :) > > Cheers, > Kilian > _______________________________________________ > swift-evolution mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution _______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
