-1
It would be inconsistent to allow it for deterministic literals (String) and
not for non deterministic literal (int which can be either a Int, Uint, Float,
…)
> Le 10 mars 2017 à 22:40, Kilian Koeltzsch via swift-evolution
> <swift-evolution@swift.org> a écrit :
>
> Hi all,
>
> I sent the message below to swift-users@ ~a day ago, but this might be a
> better place to ask and gather some discussion. It is a rather minor
> suggestion and I'm just looking for some opinions.
>
> Declaring a function that has default parameters currently looks like this:
>
> func foo(bar: String = "baz") {
> print(bar)
> }
>
> Now I'm wondering if there would be any problems if it were possible to omit
> the type annotation for default params and let Swift's type inference handle
> that.
>
> func foo(bar = "baz") {
> print(bar)
> }
>
> It feels to be equivalent to omitting type annotations with variable
> declarations. Obviously more complex types would still require annotations
> being specified. Off the top of my head I can't think of any negative
> ramifications this might bring, be it in simple function/method declarations
> or protocol extensions and elsewhere.
> Any further input or examples for situations where this might cause issues
> would be much appreciated :)
>
> Cheers,
> Kilian
> _______________________________________________
> swift-evolution mailing list
> swift-evolution@swift.org
> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
_______________________________________________
swift-evolution mailing list
swift-evolution@swift.org
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
