Would it change your opinion on the proposal?
On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 12:10 AM, Carl Brown1 <[email protected]> wrote: > I would very much like to see your proof that the resultant code is > unchanged in an arbitrary codebase. > > -Carl > > [image: Inactive hide details for Xiaodi Wu ---03/25/2017 12:01:26 AM---On > Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 11:55 PM, Carl Brown1 <Carl.Brown1@ibm.]Xiaodi Wu > ---03/25/2017 12:01:26 AM---On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 11:55 PM, Carl Brown1 < > [email protected]> wrote: > Maybe this is the core > > From: Xiaodi Wu <[email protected]> > To: Carl Brown1/US/IBM@IBM > Cc: Drew Crawford <[email protected]>, Jonathan Hull <[email protected]>, > swift-evolution <[email protected]> > Date: 03/25/2017 12:01 AM > Subject: Re: [swift-evolution] [Review] SE-0159: Fix Private Access Levels > ------------------------------ > > > > On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 11:55 PM, Carl Brown1 <*[email protected]* > <[email protected]>> wrote: > > My point is that, in rolling back the specific portion of SE-0025, > case-sensitive find-and-replace will be the trickiest thing in most > codebases, save those that result in invalid redeclarations. The behavior > of the resultant code is, unless I'm mistaken, provably unchanged. > > >
_______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
