> On 1 Apr 2017, at 09:50, Brandon Trussell <[email protected]> wrote: > > I agree that based on the method name, I thought a collection would be > returned.
Now that I think more about it, I think you're right. It is confusing. Perhaps: allAre(equalTo: ) allAre(matching: ) >> On Sat, Apr 1, 2017 at 12:36 AM, David Hart via swift-evolution >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> > On 1 Apr 2017, at 06:02, Will Stanton via swift-evolution >> > <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > +1 to adding, but the name `all` suggests (to me) the return of another >> > sequence, not a Bool. >> >> I'm not too concerned because the mandatory labels makes it clear. >> >> > Perhaps the function name should be question-like? >> > >> > Suggesting: `membersSatisfy(condition:)` or `allSatisfy(condition:)` or >> > maybe even just `satisfies(condition:)` >> > The question-like modifier/verb is necessary to suggest a Bool and IMO not >> > a needless word. >> > >> > Regards, >> > Will Stanton >> > >> >> On Mar 31, 2017, at 11:28, Ben Cohen via swift-evolution >> >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >> Hopefully non-controversial, aside from the naming of the method and >> >> arguments, about which controversy abounds >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > swift-evolution mailing list >> > [email protected] >> > https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution >> >> _______________________________________________ >> swift-evolution mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution > > > > -- > Brandon
_______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
