> On 01 Apr 2017, at 10:47, Xiaodi Wu via swift-evolution 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> On Sat, Apr 1, 2017 at 3:40 AM, David Hart via swift-evolution 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> On 1 Apr 2017, at 09:50, Brandon Trussell <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> I agree that based on the method name, I thought a collection would be 
>> returned.  
> 
> Now that I think more about it, I think you're right. It is confusing. 
> Perhaps:
> 
> allAre(equalTo: )
> allAre(matching: )
> 
> Well, if we're going to go full stdlib naming guidelines, shouldn't they be--
> 
> ```
> areAll(equalTo:)
> areAll(matching:)
> ```


thatAre(equalTo: )
thatAre(matching: )

Regards,
Rien

Site: http://balancingrock.nl
Blog: http://swiftrien.blogspot.com
Github: http://github.com/Balancingrock
Project: http://swiftfire.nl


> 
>> On Sat, Apr 1, 2017 at 12:36 AM, David Hart via swift-evolution 
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> > On 1 Apr 2017, at 06:02, Will Stanton via swift-evolution 
>> > <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> > +1 to adding, but the name `all` suggests (to me) the return of another 
>> > sequence, not a Bool.
>> 
>> I'm not too concerned because the mandatory labels makes it clear.
>> 
>> > Perhaps the function name should be question-like?
>> >
>> > Suggesting: `membersSatisfy(condition:)` or `allSatisfy(condition:)` or 
>> > maybe even just `satisfies(condition:)`
>> > The question-like modifier/verb is necessary to suggest a Bool and IMO not 
>> > a needless word.
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> > Will Stanton
>> >
>> >> On Mar 31, 2017, at 11:28, Ben Cohen via swift-evolution 
>> >> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hopefully non-controversial, aside from the naming of the method and 
>> >> arguments, about which controversy abounds
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > swift-evolution mailing list
>> > [email protected]
>> > https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> swift-evolution mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Brandon
> 
> _______________________________________________
> swift-evolution mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> swift-evolution mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution

_______________________________________________
swift-evolution mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution

Reply via email to