Just to make sure: let pair = (x: 3, y: 5) Let swapped: (y: Int, x: Int) = pair Let (y: x1, x: y1) = pair Let (x: x2, y: y2) = pair Let (x3, y3) = pair
After the change, What do (x_n, y_n) print and Which assignments are errors? Andre Videla >> On 5 May 2017, at 09:31, Xiaodi Wu via swift-evolution >> <swift-evolution@swift.org> wrote: >> >> On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 2:28 AM, Adrian Zubarev >> <adrian.zuba...@devandartist.com> wrote: >> I’m not arguing to remove all labels in Swift. Labels are great, this is a >> fact for sure. The point I was trying to make is that labels in tuples how >> either a meaning or not at all. >> >> // This is a shortcut for the tuple type `(x: Int, y: Int)` >> let foo = (x: 0, y: 0) >> >> // In this case the labels are only used for description, >> // they do not server any benefit here are most likely redundant >> let (x: x, y: y) = foo >> Labels elsewhere are a different story and I do support the cosmetic >> addition Chris Lattner sketched out here: >> https://lists.swift.org/pipermail/swift-evolution-announce/2016-July/000233.html >> >> However this is about closures and not tuples, I don’t think this would >> anyhow affect the removal of labels in tuple destructuring. >> >> Plus I don’t see this to create an inconsistent in Swift, because as I >> already said, labels in tuple destructuring are useless. >> > How come? I just illustrated their use. They help humans write correct code > by allowing the compiler to check an assertion that the human knows which > labels go with which positions in the tuple. > _______________________________________________ > swift-evolution mailing list > swift-evolution@swift.org > https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
_______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list swift-evolution@swift.org https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution