> Le 7 juin 2017 à 15:28, Xiaodi Wu <[email protected]> a écrit : > > These *are* changes related to SE-0110, and Chris and others have already > proposed possibilities for sugar that could make this better. That’s exactly > the discussion that was originally started, to be distinguished from the > alternative in which you and others are proposing reversing 5 or 6 other > proposals.
That's wrong. "I and others" have always been after ergonomics regressions, not "reversing 5 or 6 other proposals" (how dare you???) Gw
_______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
