> Le 7 juin 2017 à 15:52, Xiaodi Wu <[email protected]> a écrit : > > Let’s clarify: you just wrote that you have problems with SE-0029, SE-0066, > SE-0110, and “before,” did you not?
WTF? No I did not (citation below)! > Le 7 juin 2017 à 15:02, Gwendal Roué <[email protected]> a écrit : > >> Le 7 juin 2017 à 14:42, Vladimir.S <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> a écrit : >> >> Gwendal, again, you are proposing to revert not just SE-0110 and SE-0066 but >> mainly SE-0029 "Remove implicit tuple splat behavior from function >> applications" >> (https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/0029-remove-implicit-tuple-splat.md >> >> <https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/0029-remove-implicit-tuple-splat.md>) > > Do you mean that the regressions Stephen and I have shown have been > introduced not only by SE-0110, but before SE-0066, and SE-0029? Your attitude is obnoxious. Enough Swift evolution for me today. Gwendal
_______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
