On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 1:44 PM, Tino Heth <[email protected]> wrote: > > So, this has been discussed before on the list many times in the past. The > core team has stated that their preferred process for this is to have > individuals write their own libraries, get real-world adoption, then (as > consensus emerges) propose their inclusion as a core library. > > I already opened a new mail to write my answer, but than I thought "wait, > scroll down, and look if Xiaodi did already post links" ;-) > [But where have those potential core libraries been mentioned?] > > Anyways, my perception hasn't change much: > I think it would be enough if someone from Apple would say "here's an > empty github-repo called [math/statistics/algebra/ > crypto/graphic/image/audio/music/video/smtp/http…]; feel free to fork and > create pull requests" and adding some democratic mechanism for acceptance > on top of it. > > But as long as no one with enough reputation starts Swifts equivalent of > boost, there won't be a set of established libraries for basic data > structures and algorithms outside the stdlib. > > For anyone who thinks there's no need for a standard lib that is not the > stdlib, have a look at > https://developer.apple.com/documentation/glkit/glkquaternion-pc6 > https://developer.apple.com/documentation/scenekit/scnquaternion > https://developer.apple.com/documentation/coremotion/cmquaternion > :-( > > Tino >
Exactly.
_______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
