> On Nov 8, 2017, at 11:40 AM, Ted Kremenek via swift-evolution
> <swift-evolution@swift.org> wrote:
>
>
>
>> On Nov 8, 2017, at 4:30 AM, Wallacy via swift-evolution
>> <swift-evolution@swift.org <mailto:swift-evolution@swift.org>> wrote:
>>
>> I do not agree with Ted that only a few projects should be ranked, everyone,
>> as it is in npm should be available. Only be graded according to
>> recommendations.
>>
>
> I’m a bit confused. I’m not sure what comments of mine I’m referring to.
Clearly I’m double confused. That meant to read “I’m not sure what comments of
mine *you* are referring to”.
I fully support having a broad spectrum of libraries that the community builds
and uses. Any library that we decide to make part of “core Swift” — IMHO at a
mature point in a library’s evolution — would need to have high value to the
majority of the community and would need to feel solid enough that we can lock
it in for both source and binary compatibility, high quality of implementation
with sustained maintenance, etc.
_______________________________________________
swift-evolution mailing list
swift-evolution@swift.org
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
