Em qua, 8 de nov de 2017 às 17:58, Ted Kremenek <kreme...@apple.com> escreveu:
> > On Nov 8, 2017, at 11:40 AM, Ted Kremenek via swift-evolution < > swift-evolution@swift.org> wrote: > > > > On Nov 8, 2017, at 4:30 AM, Wallacy via swift-evolution < > swift-evolution@swift.org> wrote: > > I do not agree with Ted that only a few projects should be ranked, > everyone, as it is in npm should be available. Only be graded according to > recommendations. > > > I’m a bit confused. I’m not sure what comments of mine I’m referring to. > > > Clearly I’m double confused. That meant to read “I’m not sure what > comments of mine *you* are referring to”. > Now we are triple confused. I just read your comment again and i misinterpreted one part. Sorry. > > I fully support having a broad spectrum of libraries that the community > builds and uses. Any library that we decide to make part of “core Swift” — > IMHO at a mature point in a library’s evolution — would need to have high > value to the majority of the community and would need to feel solid enough > that we can lock it in for both source and binary compatibility, high > quality of implementation with sustained maintenance, etc. >
_______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list swift-evolution@swift.org https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
