> On 08 Dec 2017, at 10:04, Nick Keets <nick.ke...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> I think this distills the fears of some of the people that are against this 
> proposal. To paraphrase, it is the fear that the dynamic type barbarians will 
> come and pillage our villages.
> 
> I on the other hand would welcome this highly hypothetical sub community. I 
> would also welcome an obfuscated swift sub community, a non-ascii names sub 
> community and any other weird sub community. I mean, why not? They are not 
> going to affect my code or the libraries I use. Why not let them exist? 
> What's with the elitism?
> 
> 
> On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 4:09 AM, Letanyan Arumugam via swift-evolution 
> <swift-evolution@swift.org <mailto:swift-evolution@swift.org>> wrote:
> Okay I’ll concede and hope that a sub community, who are forced to use Swift 
> because of the success of this proposal and others to follow, doesn’t form 
> creating their own separate design patterns and beliefs :)

Not trying to seem elite, I just think we should all grow together and benefit 
from each other (no massive difference in style and philosophies that makes it 
difficult to cooperate).
_______________________________________________
swift-evolution mailing list
swift-evolution@swift.org
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution

Reply via email to