> On 21 Dec 2017, at 05:16, Brent Royal-Gordon via swift-evolution > <swift-evolution@swift.org> wrote: > >> On Dec 19, 2017, at 2:58 PM, Ted Kremenek via swift-evolution >> <swift-evolution@swift.org> wrote: >> >> • What is your evaluation of the proposal? > > I am pleased with the broad strokes of this design. I have quibbles with > three areas: > > 1. The `@exhaustive` attribute may be confusing because the term doesn't > suggest versioning. My best alternative suggestion is `@frozen`, which > matches existing programming terminology: something that has been frozen will > not be changed in the future. > >
I like frozen, but what is its opposite? Is it still non-exhaustive? _______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list swift-evolution@swift.org https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution