On Fri, 2014-12-05 at 14:29 +0100, Mario Torre wrote: > On Thu, 2014-11-27 at 13:09 +0100, Mario Torre wrote: > > On Tue, 2014-11-25 at 16:34 +0100, Mario Torre wrote: > > > On Tue, 2014-11-25 at 18:20 +0300, Sergey Bylokhov wrote: > > > > Hi, Mario. > > > > You are talking about low level using of gtk2/3, I am sure it will be > > > > good if two look&feels will share some code, but I was talking about > > > > the > > > > high level, from the users point of view. It can be one LookAndFeel, > > > > but > > > > with different implementations(an old one can be dropped easily later): > > > > Note that if it will be different l&f, the user will be able to set one > > > > of them and later the second one. This is resulting in gtk2 getting > > > > loaded into a process having gtk3 already loaded, in this case we can > > > > get errors like this: > > > > https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=431330 > > > > > > Right, I see now what you mean. > > > > > > Indeed, it makes totally sense. I'll amend the JEP with this > > > information. > > > > I updated the JEP with your feedback: > > > > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8065658 > > > > Thanks! > > > > Cheers, > > Mario > > > > Hi all, > > Any more comments on that? > > I would like to move the process forward if possible. > > Thanks!
Ping? Cheers, Mario
