On 12/28/2014 8:24 PM, Mario Torre wrote:
Hi Alexandr,
I'm a bit confused by the process at this stage, the Jira doesn't
allow me to edit the status, but the JEP#1 and the JEP 2.0 draft both
state that I should be able to do so.
Maybe I don't have enough powers to edit this field?
I think you can ask Mark Reinhold as he is the owner of the JEP process.
It is the only contact that I found on the JEP page
http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/1
Thanks,
Alexandr.
Cheers,
Mario
2014-12-22 15:53 GMT+01:00 Alexander Scherbatiy
<[email protected]>:
Hi Mario,
The JEP has been reviewed.
You can move the JEP to the next state according to the
http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/1 process.
Thanks,
Alexandr.
On 12/19/2014 7:42 PM, Mario Torre wrote:
On Fri, 2014-12-05 at 14:29 +0100, Mario Torre wrote:
On Thu, 2014-11-27 at 13:09 +0100, Mario Torre wrote:
On Tue, 2014-11-25 at 16:34 +0100, Mario Torre wrote:
On Tue, 2014-11-25 at 18:20 +0300, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
Hi, Mario.
You are talking about low level using of gtk2/3, I am sure it will be
good if two look&feels will share some code, but I was talking about
the
high level, from the users point of view. It can be one LookAndFeel,
but
with different implementations(an old one can be dropped easily
later):
Note that if it will be different l&f, the user will be able to set
one
of them and later the second one. This is resulting in gtk2 getting
loaded into a process having gtk3 already loaded, in this case we can
get errors like this:
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=431330
Right, I see now what you mean.
Indeed, it makes totally sense. I'll amend the JEP with this
information.
I updated the JEP with your feedback:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8065658
Thanks!
Cheers,
Mario
Hi all,
Any more comments on that?
I would like to move the process forward if possible.
Thanks!
Ping?
Cheers,
Mario
