Good day! What are the reasons behind DefaultListCellRenderer being an implementation of ListCellRenderer<Object>, as opposed to a generic ListCellRenderer?
I was able to find one of the early discussions (thread starting from here http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/swing-dev/2009-March/000428.html), but that doesn't clarify the matter much. As far as I understand, the main concern was about prototypeCellValue type, which since then was unified with list element type, so at the moment there are no arguments against DefaultListCellRenderer generification, right? Regards, Eugene
