Hello, Евгений. On 26.02.16 17:35, Евгений Бухтин wrote:
I was able to find one of the early discussions (thread starting from here http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/swing-dev/2009-March/000428.html), but that doesn't clarify the matter much. As far as I understand, the main concern was about prototypeCellValue type, which since then was unified with list element type,
It was unified in the fix where DefaultListCellRenderer was changed to use ListCellRenderer<Object>. So I think there was a reason.
so at the moment there are no arguments against DefaultListCellRenderer generification, right?
Can you provide some examples to show benefits which we will get in this case?
-- Best regards, Sergey.
