Hi Jay,
I have appended the text instead of replacing it, 
and also updated the SelectionModel methods.

Please find the updated webrev  : 
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~trebari/swing/7020860/webrev1/ 
<http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~trebari/swing/7020860/webrev1/>

Thanks
Tejpal

> On 18-Nov-2019, at 1:00 PM, Jayathirth D V <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Hi Tejpal,
>  
> I think Sergey has given more inputs on the present change that you have at :
> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/swing-dev/2016-October/006815.html 
> <http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/swing-dev/2016-October/006815.html>
> and http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/swing-dev/2017-June/007495.html 
> <http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/swing-dev/2017-June/007495.html>
>  
> Apart from this changes are fine.
>  
> Thanks,
> Jay
>  
> From: Tejpal Rebari 
> Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2019 1:55 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: <Swing Dev> [14] RFR JDK-7020860 - BasicTreeUI contains 
> getters/setters with unclear spec
>  
> Hi All,
> Please review the following fix for JDK 14.
>  
> Bug :      https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-7020860 
> <https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-7020860>
> Webrev :  http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~trebari/swing/7020860/webrev0/ 
> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~trebari/swing/7020860/webrev0/>
>  
> Issue : Class javax.swing.plaf.basic.BasicTreeUI contains some 
> getters/setters that are not consistent and 
> and have specification that says nothing about how they should be used and 
> how do they behave in BasicTreeUI.
>  
> Fix : This bug was already sent for review by semyon 
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ssadetsky/7020860/webrev.00/ 
> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ssadetsky/7020860/webrev.00/>.
> I have made the following changes to the above webrev : 
>        * @param newValue the new value of the {@code editable}> property
>        changed to —>>
>                   * @param newValue the new value of the {@code editable} 
> property
>  
> And 
>                              * Returns whether the root node of the drawn 
> tree component is displayable.
>                              
>                              changed to —>>
>                              
>                              * Returns whether the root node of the drawn 
> tree component should be displayed.
>  
>  
> Regards
> Tejpal

Reply via email to