Its looks okay.
Lets wait for Sergey’s inputs on the same.

And I think it needs CSR also.

Thanks,
Jay

> On 22-Nov-2019, at 3:04 PM, Tejpal Rebari <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Hi Jay,
> I have appended the text instead of replacing it, 
> and also updated the SelectionModel methods.
> 
> Please find the updated webrev  : 
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~trebari/swing/7020860/webrev1/ 
> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~trebari/swing/7020860/webrev1/>
> 
> Thanks
> Tejpal
> 
>> On 18-Nov-2019, at 1:00 PM, Jayathirth D V <[email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Tejpal,
>>  
>> I think Sergey has given more inputs on the present change that you have at :
>> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/swing-dev/2016-October/006815.html 
>> <http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/swing-dev/2016-October/006815.html>
>> and http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/swing-dev/2017-June/007495.html 
>> <http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/swing-dev/2017-June/007495.html>
>>  
>> Apart from this changes are fine.
>>  
>> Thanks,
>> Jay
>>  
>> From: Tejpal Rebari 
>> Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2019 1:55 PM
>> To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>> Subject: <Swing Dev> [14] RFR JDK-7020860 - BasicTreeUI contains 
>> getters/setters with unclear spec
>>  
>> Hi All,
>> Please review the following fix for JDK 14.
>>  
>> Bug :      https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-7020860 
>> <https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-7020860>
>> Webrev :  http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~trebari/swing/7020860/webrev0/ 
>> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~trebari/swing/7020860/webrev0/>
>>  
>> Issue : Class javax.swing.plaf.basic.BasicTreeUI contains some 
>> getters/setters that are not consistent and 
>> and have specification that says nothing about how they should be used and 
>> how do they behave in BasicTreeUI.
>>  
>> Fix : This bug was already sent for review by semyon 
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ssadetsky/7020860/webrev.00/ 
>> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ssadetsky/7020860/webrev.00/>.
>> I have made the following changes to the above webrev : 
>>        * @param newValue the new value of the {@code editable}> property
>>        changed to —>>
>>                   * @param newValue the new value of the {@code editable} 
>> property
>>  
>> And 
>>                              * Returns whether the root node of the drawn 
>> tree component is displayable.
>>                              
>>                              changed to —>>
>>                              
>>                              * Returns whether the root node of the drawn 
>> tree component should be displayed.
>>  
>>  
>> Regards
>> Tejpal
> 

Reply via email to