>>>>> "fastegal" == fastegal <Kleopatra> writes:
fastegal> "David M. Karr" schrieb:
>>
>> I've done some more experimentation on this. I was able to go further on the
>> idea of using a FocusListener because Kleopatra pointed out to me the new
>> "setSurrendersFocusOnKeystroke()" method on "JTable". Using this, I could
>> ensure that the spinner actually gets focus and later loses it (actually, it's
>> the internal text field, not the spinner). Unfortunately, what I found was
>> that just before the FocusListener is processed, the field has already been
>> reverted to its old value.
>>
>> So, I found that the only practical solution is to set the internal text field
>> to uneditable. In other words, to not allow manual editing of the text field.
>>
fastegal> Hm, I could not reproduce your problem, implementing a very rudimentary
fastegal> CellEditor with JSpinner. On a first test it it always relays the edited
fastegal> value to the table if commitEdit in called in stopCellEditing. Before
fastegal> going on I would like to know why that's not working in your case, so
fastegal> why do you need the focusListener at all? Do you have a little testcase
fastegal> demonstrating the problem?
I'll see if I can set that up. Just to make sure we're talking about the same
thing, you are testing direct entry of a number into the field, correct?
--
===================================================================
David M. Karr ; Java/J2EE/XML/Unix/C++
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
Swing mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://eos.dk/mailman/listinfo/swing
