I would say Solaris. Stable, well designed, full featured Unix with a stable API.
Ihsan Am 30.01.10 21:51, schrieb Mehmet Akcin: > I would say CentOS... ;) > > Stable, compatible and quick on patching critical stuff.. I have never > trusted Ubuntu on my servers maybe its because of the great with > desktops etc.. > > Never been a fan of debian.. > > > > On Jan 30, 2010, at 15:45, "Peter Keel" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> * on the Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 01:36:52PM +0100, Per Jessen wrote: >>> AFAICT from that list, you'd be fine on openSUSE too. Still, nothing >>> wrong with untar+config+make :-) >> >> Yes, very wrong. Maintainability goes trough the floor. Or are you >> sure >> not to miss a security-relevant update in an insignificant program >> like >> tar? Or any other program or library which might be a dependancy of >> the >> software you're compiling? >> >> And if you're compiling yourself, because the package in the >> distribution >> is too outdated, make packages, and name them after the same scheme >> as the >> distribution. That way your package might be upgraded automatically >> if the >> distribution ships a newer one. >> >> Cheers >> Seegras >> -- >> "Those who give up essential liberties for temporary safety deserve >> neither liberty nor safety." -- Benjamin Franklin >> "It's also true that those who would give up privacy for security are >> likely to end up with neither." -- Bruce Schneier >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> swinog mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog > > > _______________________________________________ > swinog mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog > -- [email protected] http://blog.dogan.ch/ _______________________________________________ swinog mailing list [email protected] http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
