* on the Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 10:13:57PM +0100, Ihsan Dogan wrote: > I would say Solaris. > > Stable, well designed, full featured Unix with a stable API.
And a miserable package-management. No. This won't do. If you don't need ZFS you're way better off with any Linux which has some kind of package-management. With one or two machines you might use any UNIX-ish OS, *BSD, MacOSX, Solaris, Slackware Linux, whatever, it doesn't really matter. But as soon as you're running _lots_ of machines you're practically screwed without a decent package-management. And then you'll want dpkg, or at least rpm. Cheers Seegras -- "Those who give up essential liberties for temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -- Benjamin Franklin "It's also true that those who would give up privacy for security are likely to end up with neither." -- Bruce Schneier _______________________________________________ swinog mailing list [email protected] http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
