Hi Folks, Below a good question for IP addresses from KPNQwest. From what concerns CH, i identified following blocks:
1. 193.72/15 - Allocated unspecified 2. 194.191/16 - Allocated PA 3. 195.48/16 - Allocated PA 4. 195.49/17 - Allocated PA Current AS1836 customers are actively migrating to other ISPs. Since this is often an emergency process, we (= the concerned ISPs) will originate smalller blocks. We should try to keep in touch among us, to try and preserve a consistent routing. For 1. and 2. -> no problem since /24s are always accepted For 3 and 4, a block smaller than /20 will get sub-optimal routing -> bad what about posting on this list every network each ISP will route within these blocks ? -> We can at the end say for example: ISP A got 70% of 195.49/17 -> ISP A takes over the block and only 30% of the customers have to renumber. We will route the following very soon - 195.49.3.0/24 - 195.49.118.0/24 Good idea ? Waiting for feedback Andr� >X-IPr: 164.128.36.62 >Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2002 14:54:38 +0000 >From: Andre Stiphout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: new swamp ? >User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i >Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >X-Loop-Detect: RIPE NCC > >What is the position of the RIPE NCC/RIPE community on the address space >of a SP that disappears from the net? Is there a clear statement >somewhere describing that all of the SP PA-space needs to be returned >within x months to RIPE? > >What we and other providers are seeing is that KPNQ customers want to >retain their PA space if they move over; we would like them to renumber >(of course :-) and as long as KPNQ as an entity is around we insist on >it, in the usual timeframe. > >But in the case the pullups go, signifying the end of a network, and >there is no clear RIPE policy behind this, I suspect not many providers >will care about getting these customers renumbered if these customers >feel they retain sufficient global connectivity. The net result is an >increase of the size of the routing table. > >Is this detailed in the LIR contract or something and what is the value >of that contract if the LIR disappears, but the customers find >connectivity elsewhere? > >-- >Thanks! Andr[alt-130] Stiphout - Mngr IP Core, Standards & Analysis >WorldCom - Network Services - Data Technology - AS702 > >Ultima Ratio Regum - Louis XIV >PGP Fingerprint C8 98 2D 73 5E 2A 11 01 41 C1 70 B7 95 9D 1A 4C --------------------- Andre Chapuis IP+ Engineering Swisscom Ltd Genfergasse 14 3050 Bern +41 31 893 89 61 [EMAIL PROTECTED] CCIE #6023 --------------------- ---------------------------------------------- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
