reading this part: <snip>This decision is based "sur plainte de Michel Tinguely contre Gerhard Ulrich [...] pour diffamation, calomnie, injure et tentative de contrainte". It's a single person which is being offended by these websites: it's not political censorship.</snip>
... its even more weired that they try to put legal pressure on the Swiss ISPs. Most probably, there is a lawyer making some money out of the case; under normal circumstances, someone who is offended by the site could easily file a simple lawsuit against a john doe at the place the site is hosted and then ask that the site should be shut down. but of course, this bears the risk that the person filing the lawsuit can be target of a counter-claim... i don't understand why the judge is going here this rather unusual way when the person who is responsible for the site is already known... btw: if anybody could send me a scan of the letter.. i would appreciate it. thanks. ---------------------------------------------- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
