Even if the judge does have the right to issue such an order, it is my opinion that such an order should be disputed under any circumstances. otherwise, this could cause a real flood of similar requests.
On Thu, 12 Dec 2002 16:04:39 +0100 "Manuel Wenger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > According to the UVEK Dept, they (the UVEK dept) don't have the authority to tell >ISPs to block websites. They can only order traffic monitoring. I was told to call a >lawyer at the BAKOM, which is the only authority in this matter, because blocking a >website is a concept defined in the telecommunications law. > > So I called BAKOM. There I was told that they "doubt that it makes sense to block a >website for futile reasons like personal offenses", but since it's a judge's order, >it's better to obey (a judge actually *can* legally order to block a website!). Free >"tip" from BAKOM: just block the website for 2-3 weeks, write this in a letter to >Judge Dessaux, then un-block the website after that period has passed. If no further >communication is received from the above mentioned judge, the matter can be >considered closed. Otherwise we'd have to discuss further. > > How does that sound? > > -Manuel > > > ___________________________________________________ > Ticinocom SA - Via dei Pioppi 10 - 6616 Losone > Tel 0844 007070 - Fax 0844 007071 > http://www.ticino.com > ---------------------------------------------- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: > http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/ > ---------------------------------------------- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
