There's a solution ! Make a unique Internet superhub for the whole Switzerland under direct control of the army and state, and centralise all international connections there (that imply that all international carriers should be asked to use local services or stay home).
The whole traffic incoming/outgoing from our country could be filtered from that location, and the government would have a absolute control over all communications. Anyone who use satellite or other way of communication to try to overpass this hub, should be imprisoned for life (or just disapear misteriously if prisons budget is limited). An idea would be to do it for telephony too in the future, create one central switching point for the whole switzerland. There's prolly some good consultants to hire in China to implement it. Ah yes, most important point, before doing all this don't forget a very little change in the swiss constitution, search and replace "democracy" by "communism" or "nationalism". OK I return to work, sorry for my bad humour (yes this is humour, if you took this seriously you have a problem). ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Morgan Salomon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 2:57 PM Subject: Re: [swinog] [Fwd: Sperrverf�gungen der Untersuchungsrichterin des Kantons Waadt - Muster f�r eine Einsprache] > Well my whole point is that it _can't_. I am trying to draw > a line between what is hypothetically feasible, and what is > really doable--if I build a large enough computer *nsacoughcough* I can > filter every single packet in the world for source, destination, > sender identity, formatting, context, bad grammar, rong speling. > > I don't know if what I'm suggesting is reasonable, but I wonder > whether it wouldn't be wise to present a clear, easy-to-understand > explanation of why something like common carrier status exists (at least > in the US, at least in theory.) I'm not the guy whose being asked to > do this stuff, so I can't speak for anyone; I'd just be a bit > concerned about whether going ahead and implementing what they want > while everyone tries to fight it wouldn't weaken one of the strongest > arguments against filtering/blocking/whatever--that it's not > technically practical. > > I'll shut up now. > > -John > > > > > > However - it's what they want us to do. So let's not give 'em ideas on what > > else could be done... :-) > > > > Cheers, > > Viktor > > ---------------------------------------------- > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: > > http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/ > > > ---------------------------------------------- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: > http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/ > ---------------------------------------------- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
