i would say: > 2) unacceptable, cause they no more deliver "full" internet access.
> They told us, they did that to filter some worms. I can > understand this, but > we're an ISP and IMHO the filtering should be done at the edge of internet > not in the core... i fully agree with that. -steven > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Behalf Of Pascal Gloor > Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 11:09 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [swinog] filtering ICMP... > > > After the thread seen on nanog regarding GBLX filtering/shaping ICMP > (without even telling their customers, including BGP customers), I would > like to have a bit of your opinion... > > Do you consider this as: > > 1) normal. > 2) unacceptable, cause they no more deliver "full" internet access. > 3) acceptable if they would have told their customers in advance. > 4) other? > > They told us, they did that to filter some worms. I can > understand this, but > we're an ISP and IMHO the filtering should be done at the edge of internet > not in the core... > > ? > > Pascal > > ---------------------------------------------- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: > http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/ > ---------------------------------------------- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
