I'll second that, SPF doesn't actually break anything really, since it's a progressive system in the way you can implement it. And true again that properly configured mailers and mailing list packages should not have any issues with SPF.
Maybe it's time for people to start to properly configure the MTAs and the ml packages. Thomas ----- Original Message ----- From: "Daniel Roethlisberger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, July 18, 2004 1:32 AM Subject: Re: [swinog] SPF Benoit Panizzon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-07-17/19:22]: > The actual implementation of SFP AFAIK does break most of the > mailinglists and many other widely used mail gadgets. Not true. It ``only'' breaks verbatim forwarding. Proper mailing lists are not affected, as they don't use the original envelope sender of a posting when sending messages out. But wait for the final results of the MARID IETF working group [1]; their current proposal does not break verbatim forwarding. [1] http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/marid-charter.html -- Daniel Roethlisberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GnuPG key ID 0x804A06B1 (DSA/ElGamal) _______________________________________________ swinog mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.init7.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
