Daniel Lorch wrote:
It only generates confusion and embarrassment, and I think we
should be able to rely on people being able to use their mailer's
"reply to all" feature when they want to write followups.
1000% ACK ... Don't patronise us!
-1
(I'm lazy, I like it this way)
We have the reply-to list since ages. About twice a year a meil goes
wrong, and the embarrassment for the sender is punishment enough. I'd
prefer it to leave it as it is, because reply-to-sender causes
interruptions of the discussion.
F.
_______________________________________________
swinog mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.init7.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
