On Tue, Nov 09, 2004 at 11:38:56PM +0100, Peter Keel wrote: > * on the Tue, Nov 09, 2004 at 08:49:25PM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote: > > Porbably you did not notice but SPF is dead. > > So let it rest in peace. > > Standards aren't made just because some working-group decides on it > (or not). Besides, Wasn't it Sender-ID that was killed? Explain. >
First of all it is broken or breaks many valid applications. e.g. forwarding does not work correctly and user that are forced to use some smtp proxy will have issues too. Additionally it is useless. Currently 90% of SPF verified traffic is spam. SPF does not prevent spam it is a user verification system and it does that very bad. Use crypto instead. -- :wq Claudio _______________________________________________ swinog mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.init7.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
