I recently added swordCollection.setCollectionPolicy(dataverse.getDepositTermsOfUse()) to getServiceDocument in ServiceDocumentManagerImpl and it works great, showing something like this in the Service Document:
<collectionPolicy xmlns="http://purl.org/net/sword/terms/";>Must pledge to do no evil.</collectionPolicy> Great. But now what? How would a SWORDv2 client accept this policy? >From http://swordapp.github.io/SWORDv2-Profile/SWORDProfile.html is seems like having a SWORDv2 client indicate acceptance of a collection policy is out of scope since it's getting into "policy management": "The scope of SWORD v2 will be limited to the deposit process between any two scholarly systems or between a user facing system and a service provider. This deposit process is only a portion of the full content lifecycle and does not attempt to provide support for collaborative or distributed authoring environments or policy management; it is focused entirely on the process of moving content from one location to another." Is this right? Out of scope? Do SWORDv2 server implementers have users accept the collection policy via some other mechanism such as a separate web interface or some other protocol? Thanks, Phil -- Philip Durbin Software Developer for http://thedata.org http://www.iq.harvard.edu/people/philip-durbin ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Get 100% visibility into Java/.NET code with AppDynamics Lite! It's a free troubleshooting tool designed for production. Get down to code-level detail for bottlenecks, with <2% overhead. Download for free and get started troubleshooting in minutes. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48897031&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ sword-app-tech mailing list sword-app-tech@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sword-app-tech
