On 3/13/07, jhphx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jonathon Blake wrote: > > Of course, Prayer Azariah is the simple case. The big issue is with > > Esther and Greek Esther. I'd suggest tackling that one first. [My > > solution is to simply treat Esther, and Greek Esther as two different > > books, making no attempt to map them to each other.] > > If I understand the planed steps of development, the first step is to > treat a portion of text as the author intended, without imposing a new > order on it. If the author provided two ways of treating a passage then > both of those should be used but no other imposed on it. This means > different authors will be supported differently. After the fist step of > development has been achieved then the second step may be to find a way > to convert the author's system to other systems. Then again I could be > wrong. > > Jerry
This is exactly what I forsee... but as I understand the current plan of implementation, there is no mechanism for them to specify anything other than the version that they've hard-coded into the document, and that can only support one scheme per document. I guess that I was just advocating that the alternate versification support a mechanism for the module creator to manually create any alternative mappings that they wanted from the very beginning rather than waiting to provide that functionality in the future. Just my preference. :) > > _______________________________________________ > sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org > http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel > Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page > _______________________________________________ sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
