> The link to BibleStudy's page is still current. The first two links on > the left make this clear.
How is software 3 years old, that more than likely is incompatible with today's sword, still current? If the project owner has lost interest, who is going to request that the blurb be changed? Reading further in the empycrate site, it is clear that it no longer has anything to do with the software, and the link on the left is to sourceforge. I find it strange and a little sad that in an open source Christian project, changes can only be made by funneling them through one person. I thought the wiki was and is a great idea, and like Peter, I depend on it for up-to-date information. I also tend to use it because I find the navigation of the main sword site terribly confusing. Some navigation links (by which I mean links at the top or left) point to the sword site, some point to the wiki, some to the forums, at least one is a pdf, one point's to scribe's thoughts page, others point to external sites, etc. When I am using a website, I depend on at least the main navigation remaining the same, unless I am clearly being redirected away from the main site. Matthew _______________________________________________ sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
