My difficulty with the table layout is that it relegates "special features" to just a column on the right that will be very easy to overfill, to the point of making it unusable, unreadable. But it is exactly per-app special features that can determine which app has the particular featurefulness the user wants.
For Xiphos' entries in this column, I would like to see listed quite a herd of things that Xiphos does which (almost?) none of the other apps supports: image resize; user-editable modules beyond just pers.comm.; extensive mod.mgr support including distinct updated/uninstalled listings; multi-tabbed content; default Font= respect; per-module choice to respect image content and internal font shifts; commentary by chapter; multi-module search; lexdict mouse-hover content-to-previewer; movable previewer; tab-able parallel window; double-click navigation from verse lists; companion module support; automatic MM.DD devotional access; blocked Strong's & morph display; passage exporter; direct Help menu reference to mailing list, live chat, bug tracker; ... Honestly, it could be a very long list indeed. If all this was just added to that column, it would warp the shape of the table rather severely. BPBible's "search features" column is already threatening to do so. At the least, I think per-app details should be discussed textually below the table, with observations above the table about the necessity of getting a more complete and clear picture below. I doubt I personally will add content to the page, as it's not clear my biases for Xiphos could be kept from showing. _______________________________________________ sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page