On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 11:01 PM, Chris Little <chris...@crosswire.org> wrote: > The utils tend to choke when you throw data at them in a radically wrong > versification system. Specifically, they'll choke if you give them texts > with extra chapters. Joel only has 3 chapters in the KJV versification, > which you're using, so you get a segfault when you feed imp2vs a Bible with > four chapters in Joel.
Well that explains that phenomenon. > > There is a bug somewhere, but fixing the bug still isn't going to make this > the correct versification. An error message would at least be nice. "Hey, not sure what to do with this verse." > > One of the Catholic versifications is probably the closest we have. I'm not > sure about the "endlessly repeating messages of linking different verses > together." Are they literally endless and repeating the same linkage? That's > not a bug that I know of in any of the tools. (If it's the same verse > repeating, which verse is it? And have you checked that there isn't some > sort of error in the verse numbering in/around that verse?) I would just like to reiterate - the files are freely available for anyone to take a look at and test out. This way anyone can see what is going on and hopefully help come to an informed decision about what is going on. http://dl.thehellings.com/SL_FR_BI_PDV.thml.lorem http://dl.thehellings.com/SL_PG_BI_TPC.thml.lorem These are the two files in question. I have now uploaded a copy of the output of this command $ imp2vs SL_FR_BI_PDV.thml.lorem -4 -o SL_FR_BI_PDV -v Catholic 2>&1 > SL_FR_BI_PDV.thml.lorem.err to the above location as well for you to check out. It is a 95MB file that resulted from allowing the above command to run for about 20 or 30 seconds before doing a keyboard break. I'm looking at about 2.25 million lines of output there which start out perfectly normal from file: Ge 1:1 adding entry: Genesis 1:1 length 240/240 from file: Ge 1:2 adding entry: Genesis 1:2 length 149/149 from file: Ge 1:3 adding entry: Genesis 1:3 length 136/136 ... And then turn into adding entry: Amos 9:15 length 2159/2159 from file: Ob 1 adding entry: Obadiah 1:1 length 823/823 linking entry: Obadiah 1:2 to Obadiah 1:1 linking entry: Obadiah 1:3 to Obadiah 1:1 linking entry: Obadiah 1:4 to Obadiah 1:1 <snip> linking entry: Obadiah 1:21 to Obadiah 1:1 from file: Ob 2 adding entry: Obadiah 2:1 length 492/492 linking entry: [ Module Heading ] to Obadiah 2:1 linking entry: [ Testament 1 Heading ] to Obadiah 2:1 linking entry: Genesis 0:0 to Obadiah 2:1 linking entry: Genesis 1:0 to Obadiah 2:1 linking entry: Genesis 1:1 to Obadiah 2:1 linking entry: Genesis 1:2 to Obadiah 2:1 linking entry: Genesis 1:3 to Obadiah 2:1 <snip> linking entry: Jonah 1:14 to Obadiah 2:1 linking entry: Jonah 1:15 to Obadiah 2:1 linking entry: Jonah 1:16 to Obadiah 2:1 from file: Ob 3 adding entry: Obadiah 3:1 length 465/465 linking entry: [ Module Heading ] to Obadiah 3:1 linking entry: [ Testament 1 Heading ] to Obadiah 3:1 linking entry: Genesis 0:0 to Obadiah 3:1 linking entry: Genesis 1:0 to Obadiah 3:1 linking entry: Genesis 1:1 to Obadiah 3:1 linking entry: Genesis 1:2 to Obadiah 3:1 linking entry: Genesis 1:3 to Obadiah 3:1 <snip> linking entry: Jonah 2:8 to Obadiah 3:1 linking entry: Jonah 2:9 to Obadiah 3:1 linking entry: Jonah 2:10 to Obadiah 3:1 linking entry: Jonah 2:11 to Obadiah 3:1 from file: Ob 4 adding entry: Obadiah 4:1 length 438/438 linking entry: [ Module Heading ] to Obadiah 4:1 linking entry: [ Testament 1 Heading ] to Obadiah 4:1 linking entry: Genesis 0:0 to Obadiah 4:1 linking entry: Genesis 1:0 to Obadiah 4:1 linking entry: Genesis 1:1 to Obadiah 4:1 And so on. I don't see what's so special about this point in the module, but maybe someone else can? Again, I encourage you all to take a look at the files yourself and see if you all can see something I'm missing. --Greg > > There is also a French versification system that we know of but haven't > implemented yet, which might be a better fit. > > --Chris > > > On 9/6/2011 10:30 AM, Greg Hellings wrote: >> >> Wouldn't know. I don't go near Windows without hip waders (or the >> promise of a paycheck, when it comes to my day job) on if I can help >> it. Plus, I doubt that imp2vs.exe is as up to date as the version I'm >> using in Linux. You're more than welcome to give it a try. I used >> the command >> >> imp2vs<file> -4 -o . >> >> to do the import. I also tried adding '-v Catholic' in, since these >> are French and Portugese modules, but that results in endlessly >> repeating messages of linking different verses together. >> >> --Greg >> >> On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 12:24 PM, David Haslam<dfh...@googlemail.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> Does the same segmentation fault occur when using imp2vs.exe in Windows? >>> >>> David >>> >>> -- >>> View this message in context: >>> http://sword-dev.350566.n4.nabble.com/imp2vs-segfault-tp3793577p3794046.html >>> Sent from the SWORD Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org >>> http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel >>> Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org >> http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel >> Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page > > > _______________________________________________ > sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org > http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel > Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page > _______________________________________________ sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
