The form in Byz and WHNU are what we've settled on for OSIS.
If we find something else in an OSIS module, then we probably should log it in
Jira.
In Him,
DM
On Feb 8, 2013, at 1:09 PM, Chris Burrell <ch...@burrell.me.uk> wrote:
> Hi
>
> Is there are standard subType pattern that modules are supposed to follow?
>
> It seems Byz and WHNU are using x-<n> where n is the variant number.
>
> <seg subType="x-1" type="x-variant">αχας | αχαζ | 881 {N-PRI} | αχας</seg>
> <seg subType="x-2" type="x-variant">αχαζ</seg>
>
>
> I'm seeing some code taken originally from BibleDesktop which suggests
> subType can be x-class-1 ?
>
> A post on the sword list
> (http://sword-dev.350566.n4.nabble.com/OSIS-variants-td1009209.html)
> suggests, there is also a third subtly different form:
> <seg type="x-variant" subType="x-class:1">
> (i.e. a colon separating "class" from the number.
>
> Is one more appropriate than the other form? Does a UI have to cater for all
> possible forms of subtypes? Is there a page somewhere listing the mutlitple
> forms this can take?
> Chris
>
> _______________________________________________
> sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org
> http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
> Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
_______________________________________________
sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org
http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
