I think irrespective of it ability to recognise languages (or rather not) it tells a decent account of ongoing commits in some of the projects listed.
So in that i think i can say 'a decent overview' On 11 Mar 2015 19:11, Karl Kleinpaste <k...@kleinpaste.org> wrote: > > Peter Von Kaehne wrote: >> >> https://www.openhub.net/orgs/crosswire >> This gives a decent overview of ongoing activity. > > Phooey. Its "decent overview" thinks Xiphos came into existence in 2009 and > is written in Scheme, and I can't find a way to look at the other 5 of its 6 > reviews. I am unconvinced I can trust anything else it says, either. > > DM wrote: >> >> Bible Desktop is very much alive on that criteria alone. Many, many >> downloads every month. > > Likewise Xiphos. Thousands of downloads, and that's just the source tarball > and Win32 installer; there is no way to track RPM installs, but given that > Fedora users get it automatically and Win32 users have to look for it > manually, I presume that RPM installs are substantially higher than Win32. > > Troy wrote: >> >> It's not that I don't want active development. Sure, adding new features is >> great. But just because an app hasn't been released in ages doesn't mean it >> should be removed from our app list. > > Yes, but you're one of the reasons I asked. "It seems Xiphos is the only > actively developed SWORD frontend these days" in #xiphos on 14 Jan. Similar > things were muttered at me a couple days ago, hence my question here. > > I'm not looking to get anything knocked off any list. That said, it would be > nice if folks would update the Choosing page once in several blue moons. > There are many areas yet unfilled, and quite a number of recently-created or > -updated categories that have gone blank. _______________________________________________ sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
