Less features and less options/preferences in an application make the code easier maintain and support.
An analysis of the RocWiki user data showed that no one used this feature, and the user that did provide a value for this form field supplied the URL to their homepage. I would be interested in seeing a usage analysis for this using the DavisWiki and Wiki Spot user data. William, Can you provide examples on how you use this feature? What are you specifically overriding? Adam On May 22, 2007, at 1:36 AM, William Lewis wrote: It isn't necessary but it is useful. I like to tweak how webpages look with CSS. With this feature, I don't have to futz around with things like greasemonkey and my tweaks are accessible on any computer, not just my main one. Unless it's a real pain in the butt to keep in the codebase, why remove it? William On May 21, 2007, at 10:29 PM, Adam Dewitz wrote: > Is the User CSS URL feature necessary? I don't see any tangible > benefits for the end user. I would like to get thoughts on why/why > not it should be removed from Sapling. > > Adam > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Sycamore-Dev mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.projectsycamore.org/ > https://tools.cernio.com/mailman/listinfo/sycamore-dev _______________________________________________ Sycamore-Dev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.projectsycamore.org/ https://tools.cernio.com/mailman/listinfo/sycamore-dev _______________________________________________ Sycamore-Dev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.projectsycamore.org/ https://tools.cernio.com/mailman/listinfo/sycamore-dev
