On Tue, 2010-04-13 at 16:52 -0700, Michael Ivanov wrote: > Hi Ryan, while I can't contribute, I would be interested to see how > this goes. We (Philip and I) have stayed away from this because we > felt it would cannibalize some of the contributions and use cases by > putting the comments in a different place from the rest of the article > and not allowing people to edit the comments. Having said that, it > would be good to see how this does in practice to confirm or deny this > intuition.
Yeah, there are a lot of situations where the existing comments system would be superior. If they coexist, that could be awesome. There are a few possibilities: 1) Create a new macro for the new comments system (discussion.py?) 2) Move the current comments system to a new macro (quickcomments.py?) 3) Have a config option to choose between the two for a given wiki I'm leaning towards #1, for the sake of compatibility. #2 might break more stuff than I want to be responsible for, and #3 just seems like a big decision when starting a new wiki. -rt -- Ryan Tucker <rtuc...@gmail.com>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Sycamore-Dev mailing list sycamore-...@wikispot.org http://www.projectsycamore.org/ https://tools.cernio.com/pipermail/sycamore-dev/ https://tools.cernio.com/mailman/listinfo/sycamore-dev
