On 16 Jul., 21:49, Fabien POTENCIER <[EMAIL PROTECTED] project.com> wrote: > Matthias N. wrote: > > On 16 Jul., 18:49, Fabien POTENCIER <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > project.com> wrote:
> If you remember the problem you had when you tried removing Propel, > please submit a ticket. I don't want to force people using Propel > either. Adding a task to remove Propel is somewhat difficult if you use > a svn checkout. I will have a look at that and provide a ticket or a task. :-) > > For example I'm about to refactor the things around action stack / > > controller / filter chain. > > I won't work on those things yet as I know you're working on it. Ok. I have some questions: Am I right that only the security filter and the execution filter refers to an action? All other filters run independent from whether there is an action or not!? I wonder if we could move the security filter right before the execution filter to be able to group filters to request and action filters? I'm currently about to move the execution logic from forward() into sfExecutionFilter to make it possible to change the actual module/ action inside a filter. I will probably keep the idea of action stack but refactor the concept to open it for page areas while moving it into the controller. Regards, Matthias --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "symfony developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-devs?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
