Kiril Angov wrote:

> elaborate? Likas, isn't it easy enough to do it yourself exec("convert 
> -thumbnail 150x150 source.jpg output.jpg")? So the argument that is is 
> easy enough to read a remote file and pass it as an argument does not 
> fly for me. You can have many different ways to download a remote file 
> depending on if the PHP function like fopen() file_get_contents() are 
> allowed by the php.ini setting to do so, it is a windows machine then 
> maybe there is an alternative to 'wget', etc. You get the point. Isn't 
> that the point of using a libraries, frameworks... I would agree that my 
> implementation of getting the file is not optimal and maybe I can do it 
> with some of the symfony's file handling classes (I have to look if 
> there is/are such) it is in no way security problem. Please, prove me 
> wrong :)

Well in either case the difference is that one uses standard php 
functions and the other one uses more obscure ones ..

At any rate, if you want the whole enchilada with all sorts of fallbacks 
against tightened down php versions, than this definitely belongs in 
another plugin.

> About the why one thing is supported by the sfImageMagick adapter and 
> not by the GD one - this did not stop from implementing toString() for 
> the GD adapter and not for the ImageMagick, right?

Exactly. I am with you on that one.

regards,
Lukas

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"symfony developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-devs?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to